Chapter 8 – Be Aware of the Foreign Policy Risk to Your Wealth &
Liberties
Talking Points: America's global military interventions and foreign
policy are increasingly viewed around the world as the actions of a
new empire - the Washington Empire. The past impact of previous
empires on the liberty and the economy of their citizens clearly
shows how the transition from a republic to empire now threatens
your wealth, investment portfolios, and financial freedom. Defend
yourself and your portfolio from this new foreign policy or empire
risk. Note: much of this chapter was a speech given at an investment
seminar sponsored by Anglo-Irish Bank in Vienna, Austria.
"The
civil wars in the 1st century B.C. put an end to the
Republic...then, Caesar crossed the Rubicon and it was a new era in
Rome, an era of Empire." -
Bill Bonner, Editor of The Daily Reckoning e-mail financial
newsletter.
There are the usual reasons American investors should diversify a
portion of their wealth offshore. These typical benefits include:
·
The relative
out performance of international equities to US stocks.
·
Currency
fluctuations on foreign stock returns expressed in US dollars, or in
other words, the potential for currency gains.
·
The reduction
of portfolio risk and volatility from a globally diversified
portfolio.
·
Substantial
asset protection benefits from a portfolio in a jurisdiction outside
the United States.
You can read about all of the benefits in many books and
financial websites, so I will not repeat the global diversification
benefits here. The main topic I want to discuss is a new threat to
your wealth, arising from the cause and effect actions of a new
world empire, the Washington Empire. It is not just a problem of
big government, nor some secret cabal or conspiracy. My problem with
empires throughout history is the threat their policies create for
the wealth and liberty of their own citizens.
Thus, the foreign policy/empire risk
today is creating a new reason for global diversification with
benefits far exceeding the traditional ones listed above.
America's Fall from Republic to Empire
In America today, both our politicians and the legal system
have become the major plunderers of our wealth. A study of history
clearly shows that government theft is nothing new. The
problem facing productive, wealthy Americans is that we no longer
have a constitutional republic form of government with limited
federal powers in which state governments and individuals are
sovereign. This lack of political checks and balances in Washington
is why the federal government is out of control.
The United States has evolved from an isolationist republic
with a balanced foreign policy and a government with limited powers
at home, into a world empire with troops and dominion over a large
portion of the world like the former British Empire. Even though we
may have good intentions (like the earlier British Empire), the
negative effects on personal liberty and wealth will, in the long
run, be identical to all earlier empires. The structure of empires
makes stealing wealth and power for government almost inherent.
They are also characterized by producing profits for favored
industries and the business establishment, while the consequences
for the individual citizen is often negative both in prosperity, tax
rates, and on investment markets and retained liberties.
Let's
consider for a moment the Washington foreign policy threat to your
liberty, wealth and investment portfolio. Although there is some
debate as to whether we are an empire or not, many non-Americans
around the world certainly consider us an empire. History has shown
that empires have additional risks and this is further increased by
the terrorist threat facing our nation. --
Cover detail from American Empire, by Andrew
Bacevich
Contrary to foreign and leftist propaganda, the United States
certainly is not a purely evil empire but, with military bases and
troops in over 100 countries around the globe, America often appears
heavy handed at best to most Europeans and Middle Eastern peoples.
More
importantly, 9/11 has shown how we are in a world terrorist
environment where those who hate us have the opportunity to take out
their frustrations on our foreign and diplomatic policies with
relative ease, and we have little real defense against these
actions.
We
have come a long way from the time of George Washington, when he
said, "The great
rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations is, in
extending our commercial relations we have with them as little
political connections as possible. It is our true policy to steer
clear of permanent alliances, with any portion of the foreign
world."
Can the United States
today still follow the advice of George Washington? Apparently we
can not, although for decades, countries like Switzerland, Austria,
Ireland, and Sweden have followed this wise counsel to the benefit
of their economies and financial markets.
History shows that
empires have political and military risks. Former empires like
Germany, France, Russia, and even the United Kingdom have paid the
price and discovered the real cost of global empires and constant
warfare. Today the American Empire is at extreme risk because,
although we are the major economic and military power on the earth,
our Achilles heel is the extreme risk of our financial
infrastructure and investment markets to future terrorist attack.
The history of world empires, including their rise, their
overreach, and their subsequent falls is one of the best indicators
that major diversification outside U.S. investment markets and the
dollar is necessary. Histories of previous empires also explain why
it is especially appropriate for American investors to build a
wealth preservation plan and investment portfolio specifically
designed to reduce this foreign policy or empire risk.
"Just look at history. You know, I teach college classes here in New
York. My students sometimes ask me what they should study if they
want to be successful. I tell them to read history and philosophy.
They say, 'shouldn't we be studying accounting or business...?' I
say, 'No, you've got to study history because that is all we
have...a record of all we've learned or should have learned.'"
--Jimmy
Rogers His URL is
http://www.jimrogers.com
Empires Are Subject To Risks Other Nations Are Not
The problem since 9/11 is
that the weakness of our financial structure has been exposed.
Whether it is Bin Laden, or another foreign or domestic terrorist
entity, America really has little or no defense against another
terrorist attack by extremists on a target like New York City and
our financial system.
I believe this is the real unstated reason why the new Bush
doctrine of "Preemptive Military Action" has been instituted. Since
the American military can not hope to successfully defend against
the many terrorist attacks or threats to our still relatively open
society, our new policy is to take preemptive military action
against all potential nations and terrorist organizations that might
threaten us with weapons of mass destruction.
Only time will tell if this new preemptive strategy will
successfully defend our nation or whether it will only create more
terrorist recruits and lead to more attacks against the United
States. Still, if you closely follow our foreign policy regarding
Iraq, Syria, Iran, North Korea, and other nations since 9/11, you
can only come to one conclusion. Our leaders have made this dramatic
shift in foreign policy because they fear a future attack with a
weapon of mass destruction on our nation.
The old Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) military
philosophy worked well against the Soviet Union because they had
everything to lose in an exchange of weapons of mass destruction.
This policy also works well against China because they are taking
the long view of what they want in Asia, and thus they have too much
to lose in a military exchange with the United States.
But against Islamic extremists who hate their own governments
allied with Washington almost as much as Israel and the U.S., a
major attack and an American response is the best of both worlds for
them. If there is a WMD attack against Wall Street, it matters not
to our enemies if we move against Iran, Syria, or any other existing
Arab government because war would likely bring down existing
moderate Arab governments in Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. This
is the ultimate goal of the Islamic fundamentalists. This is why
Wall Street and your wealth are the real future terrorist
targets—because our economic system runs so counter to the beliefs
and views of the Islamic fundamentalists. What other reason
explains why Islamic terrorists have targeted New York City and the
World Trade Center twice in the last ten years?
This is a major concern and risk you should factor into your
decision as to whether to go offshore with your investments. Unlike
conventional investment diversification reasons for asset protection
- more investment opportunity and risk reduction - the
terrorist threat could lead to a total financial catastrophe to
every U.S. stock market portfolio if it occurs. This is, of course
your decision, but I am factoring the potential terrorist threat
into my personal investment planning, as well as for my clients.
"The government
should plan how it could restrict civil liberties and enforce a sort
of martial law in the aftermath of a nuclear
attack" - Fred Ikle, a former
Defense Department official in the Reagan administration who
authored a book last year urging attack preparation, "Annihilation
from Within,"